Skip to content

For schools and teaching teams

Start with one teaching question. See whether Acarise earns a place in your teaching.

Run a focused pilot with a department, subject team, year group or defined group. Teachers create the activity, learners work with guided support, and your team reviews whether the evidence is useful.

Discuss a focused pilot →

A useful decision for each role

One evaluation. Different questions.

Teacher

Does it reveal reasoning I can act on?

Subject or department lead

Does it support a shared teaching question?

Senior leadership

Is the value clear enough to continue?

DPO, safeguarding or IT

Are the controls and responsibilities understood?

Business manager

Are scope, price and next steps explicit?

Follow one activity

See the exchange behind the progress.

Learners work through a conversation with Acarise. You can review what they said, how each objective is progressing and the gaps identified.

Try an activity type, then switch to the teacher’s evidence. The examples are scripted; they show the connection to look for in the app.

An activity conversation gives the teacher objective-level progress and a Chat History to review.

One objective. Three ways into it.

Acarise drafts all three activity types from your objective and grade level. Edit the material, then choose the experience that fits your teaching.

01

Guided Lesson

Learners work through the objective step by step, with guidance shaped by your teaching style and rules.

For working through an idea.

02

Mastery Check

Check understanding through written conversation or an inline quiz, with progress tracked against selected learning objectives.

For seeing what needs another look.

03

Interactive Scenario

Learners apply the objective in a roleplay, making decisions and explaining their reasoning within a scenario.

For applying an idea in a roleplay.

From evidence to action

Same evidence. Different decisions.

For teachers & academic mentors

What would make the next lesson more useful?

Open Student Work to follow objective progress live. Read Chat History and identified gaps before deciding what to revisit in a lesson or mentoring conversation.

A more focused teaching decision, grounded in learner work.

A teacher’s reviewIllustrative review

A focus for the next lesson

Compare equal wholes before comparing the fractions.

Notice
A learner compares denominators as whole numbers.
Respond
Read the surrounding exchange in Chat History.
Review
Decide which explanation or question to bring to the next lesson.

A discussion your team can have using activity evidence. This is not a separate department or leadership dashboard.

From your objective to their next step.

The learning activity and the evidence sit together. You can move from an overview to the exchange that needs your attention.

  1. 01 /

    Create an activity

    Enter one learning objective and a grade level. Review the drafted material and select the objectives to track.

  2. 02 /

    Set it for your learners

    Choose the class or individual learners, set an optional due date and write Acarise’s opening message.

  3. 03 /

    Let the activity unfold

    Learners work with Acarise in a conversation. Written objectives are assessed from their exchanges; Quiz objectives use an inline quiz.

  4. 04 /

    Open the evidence

    Watch Student Work update live. Open individual analysis, Chat History or Feedback to review progress and identified gaps.

Your first pilot

Start small. Learn something useful.

One defined group. A clear question. A review point agreed together. Choose a starting focus to explore.

A possible pilot brief

Understand misconceptions

Use a Mastery Check, then open the evidence and Chat History behind objective progress to discuss what to revisit.

The question
Does the conversation help us understand what sits behind an answer?
What we could review together
Identified gaps · usefulness of evidence · teacher feedback
Discuss this pilot

We agree scope, availability and pricing before you commit. Mentoring here means using activity evidence in your own teacher-led conversations.

From enquiry to review

A clear six-step pilot.

  1. 01

    Choose the question

    Name the teaching decision you want the pilot to inform.

  2. 02

    Agree the scope

    Confirm the group, educators, timing, support, measures and price.

  3. 03

    Complete checks

    Review data, safeguarding, technical and procurement requirements.

  4. 04

    Onboard educators

    Founder-led onboarding covers the product and agreed workflow.

  5. 05

    Run the activity

    Teachers create activities and review learner work during the agreed period.

  6. 06

    Review the fit

    Assess usefulness, staff experience and the case for stopping, adapting or continuing.

Acarise provides

Founder-led onboarding, access to the current product, support during the pilot, a review meeting and an evaluation summary.

Your school provides

A named lead, participating educators, the agreed learner group, internal approval and practical feedback.

Before you begin

Clear expectations. From day one.

The current product is available for focused evaluation. We state what is live, what is not and what your school would need to provide.

Who is a pilot for?

A school, department, subject team, year group or other defined group with a specific teaching question. Start with a manageable group and agree the scope with Adam, founder of Acarise.

What is ready, and what can we shape together?

You can create Guided Lessons, Mastery Checks and Interactive Scenarios, assign them to learners, follow progress live and review Chat History and Feedback. A pilot helps you evaluate how useful those current features are in your setting.

Can we connect our existing school systems?

Acarise works as a standalone app. Teachers sign up and request educator access; once approved, they create groups and share invite links with learners. External integrations are not currently available.

How do you use and protect learner data?

Learner data is not used to train AI models. Teachers remain responsible for interpreting outputs and deciding next steps. Review our trust and safety information and agree data arrangements before a pilot.